By Dr. Logan Chopyk
I specialize in teaching music to autistic individuals. Over the years, I’ve found that a vast majority of the most effective strategies I use didn’t come from a standard music education curriculum. Instead, they came from a vastly different realm: coaching musicians retraining from Focal Dystonia.
Many of the insights gained from dystonia retraining cannot simply be taught in a classroom; they have to be understood through the deep, personal experience of the retraining process itself. But if I had to distill the biggest lesson down to a single concept, it would be this: we must radically reframe our definition of success.
The Dystonia Experience: Stripping It Down to the Energy
In Focal Dystonia retraining, a musician has to completely dismantle their approach to their instrument. They must remove all the tension and deeply programmed physical reactions attached to the simple stimulus of playing. From there, they have to learn to do only what is necessary, rebuilding their technique one microscopic step at a time.
It is a process that can seem impossible. But it happens—fueled by hyperfocus flow states, social support, and carefully calibrated challenges.
In these moments, the common definition of success in a regular music lesson goes out the window. We are not judging the musical output and attempting to improve it incrementally. In fact, in dystonia retraining, sounding bad might actually be a massive improvement. Why? Because we are trying to do something radically different from what the musician has done in the past. This takes bold experimentation and an absolute willingness to fail.
The definition of success in that moment isn’t “Did it sound beautiful?” but rather, “Did the energy move freely?” For a wind player, this means tracking the movement of the air; for a string player, the freedom of the bow arm. We build these micro-level foundations to construct long-term structures that accomplish the impossible: regaining the ability to play music in spite of a neurological movement disorder.
Translating the Method: Teaching Autistic Students
When teaching autistic children, we must take a strikingly similar approach. We have to redefine success by fully acknowledging, accepting, and anchoring ourselves in the present state of the child.
Attempting to force traditional music learning without first establishing a foundation is a huge mistake. With autistic students, the long-term structure we are building is two-fold, but it begins entirely with relationship building. We must create a strong, safe, and trusting environment that allows for vulnerability and experimentation.
Because of this, it is entirely possible that the first several lessons will feature very little “music” coming from the child at all. And that is perfectly okay. Instead of forcing an outcome, the teacher must become deeply attuned to the student, constantly asking:
- What are they doing right now?
- What are they thinking and communicating?
- How can I playfully engage with them?
- How can I validate their current experience?
- What do they actually want to do?
- How can I guide them into a musical experience using my own music and my attunement to them?
Earning the Capital for Musical Growth
When a student has fun and feels genuinely safe, they naturally become more interested in engaging with the teacher. Through this attunement and play, the teacher earns the relational “capital” required to pursue more structured musical activities—including those that align with a student’s Individualized Education Program (IEP).
In truth, this philosophy isn’t actually fundamentally different from teaching neurotypical music lessons. The difference lies entirely in the scale of problem-solving. Just like in Focal Dystonia retraining, we must zoom our focus all the way in. We refine our definition of success to match the exact current state of the student, allowing a “win” to be as simple as taking one single step forward from where they currently stand.
Many music teachers are simply not familiar with breaking a problem down to its most fundamental, microscopic components. But when we learn to make these micro-improvements with a patient, long-term view, we create an environment where truly impossible things become possible.